(No Subject)

Subject: (No Subject)
From: Mayur Naik (mhn@hotbot.com)
Date: Wed Apr 19 2000 - 07:12:33 PDT

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Craig Chambers: "Re: (No Subject)"
• Previous message: Craig Chambers: "[Fwd: Prolem setting up Vortex/Cecil 3.0 on Solaris (problem in gc)]"
• Next in thread: Craig Chambers: "Re: (No Subject)"
• Reply: Craig Chambers: "Re: (No Subject)"

Hello

The experimental assessment in [CC99] considers the space cost of a pointer to be 1 byte. Wouldn't 4 bytes be more realistic?

I think there are a few minor errors in Table 3. For instance, the minimum number of =, <, and [] tests generated using the (=,<,[]) technique in both statically and dynamically typed versions is 0 but the size is 2 bytes and the avg. dispatch time is 2.5 cycles. The number of = tests must be changed to 1.

-- Mayur

HotBot - Search smarter.
http://www.hotbot.com

• Next message: Craig Chambers: "Re: (No Subject)"
• Previous message: Craig Chambers: "[Fwd: Prolem setting up Vortex/Cecil 3.0 on Solaris (problem in gc)]"
• Next in thread: Craig Chambers: "Re: (No Subject)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Oct 03 2000 - 15:21:30 PDT