Subject: [Fwd: [wreq #38991] New shared disks on Sun Blades (fwd)]
From: Craig Chambers (chambers@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Tue Mar 19 2002 - 13:03:09 PST
The new disks are getting incremental backed-up, right? There's a chicken and
egg problem otherwise: people won't want to use them for valuable data if
they're not backed up, but they won't be backed up until people start using
them.
-- Craig
Keunwoo Lee wrote:
>
> FYI, re: the disks (cecil25..cecil29) on the new Suns ~k
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:52:36 -0800
> From: John R. Petersen <jrp@cs.washington.edu>
> Reply-To: support@cs.washington.edu
> To: klee@cs.washington.edu
> Subject: Re: [wreq #38991] New shared disks on Sun Blades
>
> Your request #38991 was resolved by jrp:
>
> >Re: the following, I'm assuming these disks are not backed up, and so I
> >should not put any critical work on them?
> >
> >(Seems like a shame if this is the case, since there's so much space
> >there, but I suppose it's a hassle managing one more set of backups.)
>
> Backups will commence with the full backups starting next week. Before we
> got close to full's I was waiting for them to actually start getting
> populated to add them to the backup list.
>
> --John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cecil mailing list
> Cecil@cs.washington.edu
> http://majordomo.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil
_______________________________________________
Cecil mailing list
Cecil@cs.washington.edu
http://majordomo.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Mar 19 2002 - 13:04:06 PST