From: Craig Chambers (chambers@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Nov 13 2002 - 18:39:53 PST
Congratulations! My tutorial was ranked #8 for overall impression, but I'm sure
you were way ahead of me for preferred tutorial presenters. Just think what
your numbers would have been if you'd not been ill!
-- Craig
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>
> Ok, this is really own-horn-tooting, but I thought it's nice to share it.
> After all it's about our department and group just as much. Just got the
> evaluations from the oopsla tutorials, which were pretty favorable to the
> aop tutorial I taught (#16).
>
> Of the 53 tutorials, tutorial 16 ranked 12th at "overall impression," with
> 3.15 points out of 4 (0 = awful, 4 = great). Also, yours truly ranked an
> honorable place 6 in the top preferred tutorial presenters.
>
> There's some adventure to it. First, one evening before the printout
> deadline I discovered a fatal flaw in an idea that the original tutorial
> presenter was having, flaw that rendered about 30% of the material useless.
> So I reworked the thing until literally the last minute, and I mean
> *literally*. Second, I had the flu the day I talked, but under the effect of
> the adrenaline (I guess), the flu held back for the 3:30 hours of the
> tutorial... after which it resumed. Quite weird :o\.
>
> Andrei
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cecil mailing list
> Cecil@cs.washington.edu
> http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil
_______________________________________________
Cecil mailing list
Cecil@cs.washington.edu
http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 13 2002 - 18:40:00 PST