Re: FW: Internet measurements (fwd)

John Snell (geigudr@cs.washington.edu)
Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:36:42 -0700 (PDT)

This actually jibes well with the EvilNap tests I did on the data set.
The top 10 or so evil routers (ie, routers that showed up way more
in bad direct routes than in good direct routes) were almost all Verio
machines.

I thought it was an alliteration bug, at first.

On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Neal Cardwell wrote:

> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Neal Cardwell <cardwell@cs.washington.edu>
> To: syn@cs
> Subject: FW: Internet measurements (fwd)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 14:27:52 -0700
> From: Hank Levy <levy@cs.washington.edu>
> To: "'websys@cs.washington.edu'" <websys@cs.washington.edu>
> Subject: FW: Internet measurements
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ed Lazowska
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 1998 2:19 PM
> > To: Hank Levy; 'corbato@cac.washington.edu'; 'chase@cs.duke.edu';
> > John Zahorjan; Anna Karlin; 'ronj@cac.washington.edu'
> > Cc: Ed Lazowska
> > Subject: Internet measurements
> >
> > Here's some interesting stuff on ISP performance. (Verio
> > is at the rock bottom ...)
> >
> > http://boardwatch.internet.com/isp/measure.html
>