Subject: Re: Cecil for play
From: Craig Chambers (chambers@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:09:28 PST
I don't recall what Keunwoo's question was last night. Did I get it? But I'm
OK with putting interpreter executables up on the web. Maybe on the release web
page? Wouldn't you want the Cecil stdlib at least also easily downloadable?
What sort of installation instructions would you need?
Vortex for play should be commented out.
I don't care about the 95 issue, but the "project overview" main page is machine
generated from the Frame source, so it isn't really hand-hackable.
I'm happy for Keunwoo and Sorin to join the team!
-- Craig
Vassily Litvinov wrote:
>
> Following up on Keunwoo's question last night, wouldn't it make sense to
> put up the cecil-interpreter executables on the web, like one per each
> platform? It could go on the Cecil main page instead of the "Vortex for
> play" link (which, I get an impression, is not used by anyone).
>
> And while I am on web:
>
> - I'd say that Keunwoo and Sorin deserve a place on the "project
> members" page, and
>
> - some document written in 1995 probably shouldn't appear as the first
> item in the "more information" list. (One idea I had is to move
> the 1995 disclaimer from the Cecil main page to the project overview's
> main page.)
>
> Vass
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:09:33 PST