Subject: Re: Cecil for play
From: Vassily Litvinov (vass@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:50:33 PST
> I don't recall what Keunwoo's question was last night. Did I get it? But I'm
He just asked me.
> OK with putting interpreter executables up on the web. Maybe on the release web
> page?
Either way is fine - what do you prefer? So there are three options:
a) put it on Cecil home page where "vortex for play" used to be
(that was my original motivation)
b) put it on the release page
c) put it on the _Cecil_ page (the one that talks about Cecil language)
I don't have a strong argument in favor of (a) (except promoting Cecil
language). Doing both (b) and (c) seems good.
> Wouldn't you want the Cecil stdlib at least also easily downloadable?
Dunno. Opinions anyone?
> What sort of installation instructions would you need?
I think the interpreter is a stand-alone executable, hence no instructions
needed. Does this seem right?
> Vortex for play should be commented out.
Done.
> I don't care about the 95 issue, but the "project overview" main page is machine
> generated from the Frame source, so it isn't really hand-hackable.
Technically speaking, either the Frame source or the machine-generated
file could be hacked if desired.
> I'm happy for Keunwoo and Sorin to join the team!
Done, too.
> -- Craig
Vass
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Wed Jan 24 2001 - 14:50:40 PST