Re: Problems with Cecil on x86 Linux

From: Craig Chambers (chambers@cs.washington.edu)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 14:19:17 PST

  • Next message: Craig Chambers: "Re: Problems with Cecil on x86 Linux"

    Hmm. I'm not sure what we can do to fix this problem. We're just using (our)
    version of g++ for compiling these binaries, with no special flags controlling
    how things get linked. I guess we could try to do full static linking so there
    are no dynamically linked symbols required. We'll look into it.

    -- Craig Chambers

    Ryan Daum wrote:
    >
    > I am very interested in trying out the Cecil language, but I am having
    > some problems getting it running...
    >
    > Cecil/Vortex seems to be linked in such a way to require specific symbols
    > from Glibc 2.1, while most Linux distributions now ship with Glibc 2.3.
    > Is there a known way around the problem?
    >
    > The specific run-time error I am getting is:
    >
    > bin/linux/cecil: relocation error: bin/linux/cecil: symbol
    > __libc_stack_end, version GLIBC_2.1 not defined in file ld-linux.so.2 with
    > link time reference
    >
    > This is under a Debian install with ld-linux-2.3.1 in /lib
    >
    > Ryan
    >
    > ____________________________________________________________________________
    > ____ ryan daum ____________________________________ ryan@techno.ca _________
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > Cecil mailing list
    > Cecil@cs.washington.edu
    > http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil
    _______________________________________________
    Cecil mailing list
    Cecil@cs.washington.edu
    http://mailman.cs.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/cecil

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 06 2003 - 14:19:22 PST