RE: name

John Snell (geigudr@cs.washington.edu)
Sat, 2 May 1998 08:06:18 -0700 (PDT)

Of all the names, Detour has the best ring to it. (Aside from Labyrinth,
which seems to have been ignored. :> ).

How about Shrike?

On Fri, 1 May 1998 savage@cs.washington.edu wrote:

> Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 19:09:20 -0700
> From: savage@cs.washington.edu
> To: voelker@cs.washington.edu, cardwell@cs.washington.edu
> Cc: syn@cs
> Subject: RE: name
>
> I prefer passageway to just passage, although I think detour is a bit
> better than both.
>
> - Stefan
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Geoff Voelker [SMTP:voelker@cs.washington.edu]
> > Sent: Friday, May 01, 1998 7:10 PM
> > To: cardwell@cs.washington.edu
> > Cc: syn@cs
> > Subject: Re: name
> >
> > > howbout one after the search for a better route across america
> > running
> > > through this neck of the woods: "Northwest Passage". yeah, too
> > verbose...
> >
> > could just go with "Passage" (although it sounds a lot like
> > "Lossage").
> >
> > -geoff
>

_____________________________________________________________________________
"One of these days, I'm going to implement a new method of controlling
network flow: Selective Negative Acknowledgements -- If for no other
reason than the opportunity write about SNAKs."